🔗 Share this article

Do your LinkedIn connections viewing you as a industry expert? Are hordes of commenters applauding your insights on growing your venture? Are headhunters reaching out to explore collaborations?

Should that not be the case, the explanation could be your gender.

The Test: Changing Profile Gender to achieve Increased Reach

Numerous women participated in an organized LinkedIn experiment this week following popular discussions suggested that switching their gender to "male" enhanced their platform visibility.

Some participants modified their profiles to include what they called "masculine-oriented" language - adding action-focused business buzzwords like "drive", "transform" and "accelerate". Based on reports, their exposure also improved.

Systemic Preference Questions Brought Up

The engagement increase has caused some to wonder whether an inherent gender bias in LinkedIn's algorithm prioritizes men who employ professional networking terminology.

Like many large networking sites, LinkedIn employs a computerized system to decide which posts are shown to which users - boosting some while suppressing others.

Company Statement

In a recent company announcement, LinkedIn recognized the phenomenon but stated it does not factor in "demographic information" when deciding content distribution. Instead, the company explained that "numerous factors" affect how content are received.

Changing gender in your settings does not influence how your posts shows up in search or feed.

Individual Results

A social media consultant, who changed her gender identifiers to "he/him" and her profile name to "a masculine version", described remarkable outcomes.

"The numbers I'm seeing show a sixteen-fold rise in profile views and a 1,300% increase in content views," she noted.

Megan Cornish, a communications strategist, began experimenting after observing her reach decline substantially.

The Process

• Initially, she changed her profile gender to "man"
• Subsequently, she used AI tools to rephrase her professional summary using "masculine-oriented" language
• Lastly, she repurposed old posts with comparable "assertive" language

The result was immediate: a 415% increase in visibility within one week.

The Negative Aspect

Although the success, Cornish expressed dissatisfaction with the approach.

"Before, my posts were more personal - concise and clever, but also friendly and human," she explained. "Currently, the masculine version was forceful and self-assured - similar to a white male swaggering around."

She abandoned the test after seven days, stating "Each day I persisted, and results improved, I became angrier."

Mixed Results

Some testers encountered positive outcomes. One writer who modified both her gender to "male" and her race to "white" described a decrease in visibility and interaction.

"We know there's systemic preference, but it's very challenging to comprehend how it operates in specific cases or the reasons behind it," she remarked.

Broader Implications

These tests coincide with ongoing conversations about LinkedIn's distinctive role as both a business platform and community site.

Platform modifications in the past few months have apparently caused female creators experiencing markedly lower exposure, resulting in informal experiments where the same posts by men and women received vastly different audience engagement.

System Details

Per LinkedIn, the platform uses AI systems to categorize and spread content based on multiple factors, including post content and the user's professional identity.

The company states it regularly evaluates its systems, including "checks for inequalities based on gender."

A spokesperson proposed that recent declines in certain members' visibility might stem from increased competition due to additional posts on the network.

Changing Landscape

According to a tester observed, "bro-coding" appears to be growing on the network.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more businesslike and refined," she remarked. "This is evolving. It's becoming increasingly aggressive and less controlled."