🔗 Share this article

The count of guaranteed positions for Māori representatives on New Zealand councils is set to be cut by more than half, after a controversial legislative amendment that required local governments to put the fate of hard-won Māori seats to a popular referendum.

Historical Context on Indigenous Representation

Māori wards, which can include one or more elected officials depending on demographic data, were created in 2001 to provide Māori electors the option to vote for a assured Māori representative in municipal and provincial governments. Originally, councils were only able to create a Indigenous seat by initially submitting it to a community referendum in their area. Local populations frequently devoted considerable time building community backing and pushing their councils to create Indigenous representation.

Policy Changes and Government Actions

To remedy the issue, the previous Labour government permitted local councils to set up a Indigenous seat without first requiring them to subject it to a popular ballot.

But in 2024, the right-wing coalition government overturned the policy, saying communities ought to determine whether to introduce Indigenous representation.

Referendum Results

The coalition’s law change required local authorities that had established a ward under the previous policy to hold decisive public votes concurrently with the local body elections, which ended on 11 October. Of 42 councils participating in the public vote, 17 decided to keep their seats, and twenty-five to disestablish theirs – showing numerous areas against reserved Indigenous seats.

The results provided “a vital step in restoring community self-determination.”

Critics nevertheless have condemned the new policy as “discriminatory” and “against Indigenous interests”. After assuming power, the current administration has implemented extensive reversals to measures designed to enhance Māori health, wellbeing and representation. The government has stated it wants to terminate “ethnic-specific” approaches, and says it is dedicated to improving outcomes for Māori and every citizen.

Urban-Rural Divide

Outcomes of the referendums were split down city-country divisions – six of the seven cities required to vote backed Indigenous seats, while countryside areas leaned strongly towards removing them.

“It’s a real shame for the Māori wards that had recently been established – they’re just beginning to find their footing.”

Electoral Participation and Criticism

The recent local government elections registered the smallest electoral participation in over three decades, with under one-third of citizens casting a vote, leading to calls for an overhaul.

This approach had been “a mockery”.

Differential Standards

Councils are permitted to establish different electoral districts – including countryside seats – without first requiring a community ballot. The disparate requirements applied to Māori wards indicated the administration was singling out Indigenous inclusion.

“Ultimately, they were unsuccessful. Numerous localities have given the government a middle finger response.”

This remark concerned the 17 areas that voted to keep their seats.